LIST OF WITNESSES MAY BE FILED AT BELATED STAGE;

: عدالت جب ایشوز فریم کرتی ھے تو 7 دن میں لسٹ گواھان داخل کرنی لازم ھوتی ھے اس کیس میں اندر 7 یوم لسٹ داخل نہیں ھوئی۔ بعد میں درخواست گزاری گئی جو ماتحت عدالت اور عدالت اپیل نے بھی خارج کر دی۔ لیکن ھائیکورٹ نے جرمانہ کے ساتھ داخل کرنے کی اجازت دی۔2023 Y L R 37[Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench)]
 Versus Extra Region Judge and other respondents     (a) Common Method Code (V of 1908) - - - - ----O. XVI, R.1- - - Witness list:
make a difference for it to be decided on merit:
Respondent/offended party documented suit for explicit execution of agreement on the premise of oral consent to sell against solicitor/litigant Issues were outlined, and parties were coordinated to present their rundown of observers within seven (7) days; however, the candidate or litigant had no information about the said request. When proof of the respondent or offended party was closed,  it came to the attention of the solicitor or litigant that a rundown of witnesses was not presented by the candidate within the time limit. The applicant/litigant documented an application under the watchful eye of the Common Court for submitting a rundown of witnesses, which was excused. The applicant recorded a common correction under the watchful eye of the revisional court, which was likewise excused. Held, that request sheet added with the request uncovered that on March 10, 2016, an application documented by the respondent for a brief directive was permitted, and in the wake of cultivating issues, the preliminary court guided the gatherings to submit a rundown of witnesses and testament for preparation to deliver proof within seven (7) days. The said request was passed by the preliminary court in the presence of the two players. The suit was concluded on many dates for the recording of proof of the offended party, and proof of the respondents witnesses was recorded, and counsel for the solicitor led questioning of them.
The offended party created his narrative proof, and afterward the case was fixed for proof of the applicant or litigant. Guidance for the applicant documented an application under the watchful eye of the preliminary court for submitting a rundown of observers at a late stage, which was excused by the preliminary court, which implies that direction for the candidate had been showing up in the court yet didn't document an application for submitting a rundown of witnesses. Insight for the solicitor mentioned just a single open door to submit a rundown of witnesses, even on installment of expenses, as significant freedoms of the solicitor were associated with the matter. Request was permitted by the High Court, and the Preliminary Court was coordinated to give just a single person an open door and fixed a date for submitting the rundown of observers by the solicitor. On the off chance that the expense forced was not paid or the rundown of witnesses was not submitted on the decent date as coordinated, the preliminary court ought to continue with the matter as per regulation.                      
(b) Organisation of equity Details of the method should be stayed away from, and the matter ought to be settled on merits. - - - The request was permitted. Mst. Bundi Begum v. Munshi Khan and others, PLD 2004 SC 154;
Syed Sharif ul Hassan through LRS. v. Hafiz Muhammad Amin and others 2012 SCMR 1258, and Zohra Bibi and another v. Haji King Mahmood and others
(2018) SCMR 762.